Clean up on aisle 9

Clean up on aisle 9

Once again, The Telegraph sensationalizes scientific news that doesn’t need it. The work done by Dr. Katrin I. Andreasson’s group at Stanford is exciting enough. The Telegraph doesn’t have to use a title that suggests they have a cure for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). I’ll admit they didn’t do a terrible job. I’ve got worse examples below. So what’s really going on? The researchers at Stanford found that a particular cell signaling pathway, cyclooxygenase/prostaglandin E2 (COX/PGE2) pathway, was involved with restoring the function of microglial cells.

☼ What are microglial cells?

Glial cells are “support” cells in the brain, as they surround neurons, providing the mylein sheath (think of it as electrical insulation). Microglial cells are scavengers in the brain, like macrophages. In fact microglial cells (like the image below) are more like macrophages than they are like glial cells.  It’s thought that microglial cells are less efficient in older animals and therefore cannot clear as much debris from the brain. In particular, beta-amyloid is thought to accumulate in Alzheimer patients eventually causing dementia. If the microglial cells could resume their clean up job then the beta-amyloid wouldn’t accumulate.

☼ Cyclooxygenase/prostaglandin E2 (COX/PGE2) pathway

I’m not an expert in cell signalling so I’ll just highlight the important bits. Again, since microglial cells are more similar to macrophages than neurons, it was hypothesized that an inflammatory response was involved with microglial function. COX1 and COX2 along with PGE2 are known components of an inflammatory signaling pathway. More importantly, it’s related to aspirin and aspirin was shown to be beneficial to preventing onset of dementia in AD patients. There’s a catch though. There’s always a catch. Aspirin only helps if AD is detected early. That’s one of the biggest stumbling blocks to AD research, early detection (more on that below). The Stanford group found that if you block EP2 signalling (it’s part of the PGE2 pathway), you can restore the function of microglial cells and they can resume clean up on aisle 9.

So how did they do this? They did some in vitro work, i.e., work with macrophage cells in a dish to start identifying part of the cell signalling. They also did work with genetically altered mice, the so-called knock-out mice, to see if blocking certain parts of the pathway restored function of the microglial cells. Combined, their work suggests that blocking EP2 restores microglial function and memory impairment is reduced.

So this is very promising work but it is not a cure for AD. They have to identify an EP2 blocking agent, make sure it works in mice. Make sure it isn’t toxic in mice and one large species. Then they have to do toxicology studies in humans before even thinking of testing on AD patients. Notice how the titles of the articles become less sensational when you compare them?

References:

Has Stanford University found a cure for Alzheimer’s disease? via The Telegraph

http://goo.gl/hVnGcf

Blocking receptor in brain’s immune cells counters Alzheimer’s in mice, study finds Stanford press release

http://goo.gl/L1PUyt

Prostaglandin signaling suppresses beneficial microglial function in Alzheimer’s disease models

https://www.jci.org/articles/view/77487

Want to learn more about Alzheimer’s Disease?

Alzheimer’s Disease Research

https://plus.google.com/+ChadHaney/posts/ddm3JqPMy76

Want to learn more about how drugs are developed and see another example of hype from The Telegraph?

Bench to Bedside

http://goo.gl/63mKa

Another example of media hype.

Alarming science discovery…

http://goo.gl/sLjT5

Image source:

http://individual.utoronto.ca/lyanneS/invitro.html

#ScienceSunday  #ScienceMediaHype

0 Comments

  1. Rajini Rao
    January 11, 2015

    Great post on #ScienceMediaHype  Chad Haney . It’s great that you cited the title of the peer reviewed paper, the University press release and then the pop sci news headlines. The claims become noticeably more sensational. That’s why it’s good for everyone to at least read the abstract of the scientific paper, if not the paper itself. 

    Reply
  2. Chad Haney
    January 11, 2015

    Thanks Rajini Rao​. I do hope that people notice the differences in the titles.

    Reply
  3. Brigitte W.
    January 11, 2015

    Sharing to self to save. Thanks.

    Reply
  4. Chad Haney
    January 11, 2015

    You are welcome Brigitte W.​

    Reply
  5. Deen Abiola
    January 11, 2015

    Excellent post. But don’t blame just The Telegraph, hold the press release writers accountable too. Theirs is not much better especially since they should know better. News articles exaggerate, so it follows that pr pieces shouldn’t start out hyperbolic themselves. There’s a study in the BMJ showing more level press releases leads to better news pieces.

    Reply
  6. Buddhini Samarasinghe
    January 11, 2015

    This is great, thanks for writing this!

    Reply
  7. Chad Haney
    January 12, 2015

    Thanks Buddhini Samarasinghe​ I bet you could have done better since it’s more up your alley.

    Reply
  8. Chad Haney
    January 12, 2015

    I agree to some extent Deen Abiola​. Since moving to Northwestern University, I have more insight into how philanthropy and alumni associations work. There’s a lot of pressure to be in the spotlight to get alumni and philanthropists excited. There has to be a happy medium. Of course more federal funding could help to.

    Reply
  9. Gary Ray R
    January 12, 2015

    Nice write up Chad Haney, better than mine was.  

    Reply
  10. Chad Haney
    January 12, 2015

    Thanks Gary Ray R​

    Reply
  11. Steve Esterly
    January 12, 2015

    Chad Haney – great example of how hype tends to escalate as you move from research paper to institutional press release to popular news report. Sigh.

    I happened to be talking earlier this week with someone who works in this field and knows some of the paper’s authors, and his feeling was very much like yours: this is very promising research, but there is a very long way to go, with many potential pitfalls along the way, before we can begin thinking about clinical treatment.

    Reply
  12. Chad Haney
    January 12, 2015

    Thanks Steve Esterly. I’m collaborating with someone in AD research. He’s developing an agent for early detection. If it works, then these ideas have a better chance of working. Even the early detection agent has a long road ahead.

    Reply
  13. Brigitte W.
    January 12, 2015

    Just in case, I’m taking an aspirin.

    Reply
  14. BABA BABA
    September 7, 2015

    Thanks allot sir’s as human bring .I have to wish u all the best stating with love no words to say thank you thank you !!!

    Reply
  15. HT Bradshaw
    May 21, 2016

    8 )

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.