
Bubbles and Science Rabbit Holes
After reading Rajini Rao’s champagne science post, I figured I should join in. Except most of you know I drink beer and not much wine or champagne. Also, since the champagne post is related to New Years celebration, I’ll mention that craft beer in the USA, in the Midwest in particular, is improving every year. Here’s to more craft beer in the Midwest.
Rajini’s post reminded me of two beer-bubble related posts. One is why do bubbles sink when you pour a glass of Guinness stout. The other is what causes a “beer volcano”.
Part I: Sinking Bubbles
Guinness stout and a few other beers, e.g., Boddingtons Pub Ale, have nitrogen gas in them, in addition to carbon dioxide. It creates a creamy head and takes away some of the bitterness (from the hops) that some people don’t like. Some of you may know that Guinness and Boddingtons in cans, have a widget, which is a plastic device with pressurized nitrogen. It helps recreate the pub experience of a draught beer. Did I mention rabbit holes? Back to sinking bubbles. Physicists at the University of Limerick in Ireland published a beautiful paper based on simulations and experiments, explaining why bubbles sink instead of rise in a pint of Guinness.
Fluid Dynamics
Benilov et al, explain that the small (nitrogen and carbon dioxide) bubbles sink along the surface of the glass while the bubbles in the center of the glass rise. Using the Bond number, Stokes formula, Reynolds number, and void fraction, they simulated bubbly flow for various shapes of glasses. The Bond number helps determine the shape of the gas bubbles. The Stokes formula is used to estimate velocity. The Reynolds number is used to determine whether you have laminar or turbulent flow and the void fraction estimates the amount of volume that the gas contributes to. It turns out that the shape of the glass matters. If the glass has a wide opening that narrows towards the bottom, the bubbles will sink. If the opening is smaller at the top, like a beer bottle, the bubbles won’t sink.
All of this lead me down memory lane (which seems fitting at the end of the year) as Reynolds numbers and Stokes equations factored heavily in my undergrad studies as a chemical engineer. Again, speaking of rabbit holes, I was fascinated to find that the Navier-Stokes equations are part of the Clay Mathematics Institute seven most important open problems. From the Wiki: The Navier–Stokes equations are also of great interest in a purely mathematical sense. Somewhat surprisingly, given their wide range of practical uses, it has not yet been proven that in three dimensions solutions always exist (existence), or that if they do exist, then they do not contain any singularity (they are smooth). These are called the Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness problems.
Part II: Beer Volcano
Some of you may know the prank where you smack your mate’s open beer bottle with a strong hit and the beer comes gushing out. Now with good craft beer, that would be sacrilegious so I won’t be surprised if my beer pals are not aware of such shenanigans. Again, fluid dynamics tells us that it is due to a mushroom cloud, not unlike that of an atomic bomb.
Rodriguez-Rodriguez et al explain that a compression wave is generated by the sudden vertical impact on the beer bottle and that waves bounce back and forth until damped out. The free surface at the small bottle opening is key to forming the train of expansion/compression waves that drive the bubble implosions. The rapid collapse of the bubbles is called cavitation, which is a serious problem with pump failures.
I better wrap up this post before I go down another rabbit hole. So cheers and a happy New Year to you.
Links to references and more info:
Champagne Science via Rajini Rao
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RajiniRao/posts/WNRS3NVBHsr
Chemistry of Champagne via Compound Interest
https://plus.google.com/109532635324178687034/posts/acpSfMU9uUb
Sinking Guinness Bubbles via Bryan Jones
https://plus.google.com/+BryanJones1/posts/ZonTTDKWTuy
Why do bubbles in Guinness sink?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5233
Beer, mushroom clouds, science, what more can you ask for?
https://plus.google.com/+ChadHaney/posts/BZvh3hUpByB
Why does a beer bottle foam up after a sudden impact on its mouth?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.3747
Navier–Stokes equations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations
I leave you with
Bubbling by Aswad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iAQH3kCXRs
Image source:
#ScicenceEveryday #Beer
December 31, 2014
I nominate this the best post of the New Year.. hic ! I’m off to look for an image of this widget thingie that inserts N2 into a beer can #rabbithole
Edit: there’s even a Wiki page on this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widget_%28beer%29
December 31, 2014
Thanks, Rajini Rao. I’m scared to think of the number of cut fingers of people trying to find out “what is that thingy in the can”.
December 31, 2014
Happy hic new year!
December 31, 2014
Don’t be digging for widgets and bottom’s up, Jodi Kaplan .
December 31, 2014
Happy New Year Jodi Kaplan
December 31, 2014
Once upon a time, long before we were more enlightened with craft beer, we were college students. We may have been into quantity over quality and pulled a prank that may resemble what you describe. Or even had a “shotgun.” 😉
But along came Shorts and Founders and Kuhnhenn and more and we liked how it tasted as opposed to getting wasted.
Cheers to 2015, my friend, and GO WINGS!
December 31, 2014
Cheers Ray of Sunshine and hopefully the Wings don’t stumble against the Devils.
December 31, 2014
I prefer beer cans. Not to drink (not a beer drinker), but for the fact that shaking it is far easier than hitting an open bottle 😉
Happy New Year, Chad Haney!
December 31, 2014
Happy New Year Carissa Braun. You can shake all the beer cans you like. You are wiser not to drink Bud.
December 31, 2014
Happy New Year, Chad Haney!
What? Beer volcano? What is this prank you speak of??? Bahaha!
smack!
December 31, 2014
Happy New Year to you and your family Brigitte W..
December 31, 2014
Thanks, Chad. No telling about 2015.
January 1, 2015
It should be better for me, B. I don’t plan on breaking any bones in 2015.
January 1, 2015
Overachiever!
That was incredibly bad.