Empathy: helps on the way

Empathy: helps on the way

I came across an article in Psychology Today discussing the  Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. You can read more about the declaration in the links below. Basically a group of scientists met in Cambridge and proclaimed their support for the idea that some animals have a consciousness. Don’t get carried away and confuse that with intelligence. Also the declaration doesn’t say anything about the treatment of animals. I was a bit annoyed that the Psychology Today article kept mentioning abuse, as if to stoke the ire of the animal rights activists. It’s interesting that the article mentions the Animal Welfare Act. It is true that there are some animal studies that the general population might find unsettlingly. However, there are so many regulations on what you can and cannot do when it comes to animal research, that I find the term “abuse” to be disingenuous. Contrast that with the article from io9.

I’m in total agreement that some animals have consciousness and that they should be treated humanely. Here’s an excerpt from the declaration.

The absence of a neocortex does not appear to preclude an organism from experiencing affective states. Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Nonhuman animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.

I’ve talked about birds already (see the PET link below). The rest of this post will focus on something I shared back in December 2011. I shared it privately as I was new to G+. So I’m redoing it here. The image below is a screen capture of a study by a group at the The University of Chicago The video is in the link below, Helping your fellow rat.. Bartal et al showed that rats can demonstrate empathy by having a free rat rescue his or her cagemate, which is placed in a plastic restrainer. Once the rats learned to open the restrainer, they only opened it if there was a cagemate in it, i.e., if it was empty or had an object inside they left it locked. Also, when presented with a locked cagemate and a locked piece of chocolate, the free rat would unlock both and share the chocolate. That’s better than many politicians. Rats were initially startled by the door opening. In later repeated tests, the rats were no longer surprised by the door opening, i.e., it was an expected outcome.

The data suggests that females are more empathetic. All of the females became door openers while only 70% of the males opened the door. Also, the females learned to open the door sooner than the male rats.

Combined with the bird studies, there is mounting evidence that animals have more going on in their brains than some people think.

Links to references:

The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness

http://goo.gl/tXglo

Scientists Finally Conclude Nonhuman Animals Are Conscious Beings

by Marc Bekoff, Ph.D. in Psychology Today

http://goo.gl/wecrHZ

Prominent scientists sign declaration that animals have conscious awareness, just like us

http://goo.gl/tWh8t io9 George Dvorsky

Something to crow about: PET Bird Brains

http://goo.gl/8Xfg0k

Helping your fellow rat: Rodents show empathy-driven behavior 

http://goo.gl/oTwnn

Published in Science

Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats.

Ben-Ami Bartal I, Decety J, Mason P.

Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30. doi: 10.1126/science.1210789.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=22158823

#ScienceSunday  

0 Comments

  1. Robert Miller
    September 15, 2013

    Waaay back when I got my degree the common thought in Psych was that animals had no emotions, etc…. I knew it was wrong then, and am glad they are finally “proving the reality”.

    Reply
  2. Knut Torgersen
    September 15, 2013

    Some years ago, Norwegian TV showed male piglets being collected and neutered. Luckily, we did not see the process itself, but we did see the poor piglets literally shaking with fear and pain, as they did the surgery using no anaestethic. If I remember correctly, this was to show inhumane treatment of animals, as the farmer himself insisted the pain-like reactions had nothing to do with pain, as a pig “was not intelligent enough”. Why only males? For better-tasting meat.

    Reply
  3. Chad Haney
    September 15, 2013

    Robert Miller I won’t ask how far back. I had a coworker that believed that ‘lower’ animals couldn’t feel pain. I tried to explain that there is a whole host of cascading biochemical events associated with pain that would be a confounding problem with the data.

    Knut Torgersen some farmers have changed there practices because a ‘happy’ animal is a better, healthier product.

    Reply
  4. Gita Jaisinghani
    September 15, 2013

    Fascinating. I have to come back and read through the links.

    Reply
  5. Mary T
    September 15, 2013

    The free rat would unlock both and share the chocolate.  That’s better than many politicians.  Priceless, Chad Haney Haha!  Great post.

    Reply
  6. Chad Haney
    September 15, 2013

    Thanks Mara Rose and Gita Jaisinghani

    Reply
  7. Micha Fire
    September 15, 2013

    =)) great post Chad Haney 

    fits right in with the lecture of social psychology course at the moment

    Reply
  8. Chad Haney
    September 15, 2013

    You are welcome Micha Fire

    Reply
  9. Chad Haney
    September 15, 2013

    If anyone is having trouble with the video (I know it’s wonky), try this direct link. http://mindonline.uchicago.edu/media/news/bartal_768k.mp4

    Reply
  10. John Christopher
    September 16, 2013

    Thanks for the update Chad Haney I have, for a couple of decades now, assumed that perceived consciousness / sentience (not intelligence) should be our guide on what life forms we kill to eat… This summary will serve well as a reference point.  Thanks.

    Reply
  11. Chad Haney
    September 16, 2013

    I admire my vegetarian friends for that reason John Christopher 

    Reply
  12. tevin darby
    September 16, 2013

    Okay

    Reply
  13. Gretchen S.
    September 16, 2013

    I like that rats share chocolate. 🙂

    Reply
  14. Musa Mohammed
    September 16, 2013

    Hmmmm its life

    Reply
  15. Knut Torgersen
    September 16, 2013

    Chad Haney We have animal protection rights ere in Norway, too, but they are sadly controlled by the same regime that takes care of food safety.

    Reply
  16. Chad Haney
    September 16, 2013

    Is that bad in Norway, Knut Torgersen

    Reply
  17. Knut Torgersen
    September 16, 2013

    I’d say it is regrettable that the same instance responsible for food safety also has the responsibility for animal safety. It feels a bit like a contradiction. We have no official RSPCA or similar.

    Reply
  18. Micha Fire
    September 16, 2013

    You want good meat – treat animals well. What’s so odd about them working together?

    Reply
  19. Knut Torgersen
    September 16, 2013

    I find it odd we have no separate animal interest organization. It feels like the military being the police force.

    Reply
  20. Jasmin Christensen
    September 17, 2013

    Okay

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Chad HaneyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.