
Empathy: helps on the way
I came across an article in Psychology Today discussing the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. You can read more about the declaration in the links below. Basically a group of scientists met in Cambridge and proclaimed their support for the idea that some animals have a consciousness. Don’t get carried away and confuse that with intelligence. Also the declaration doesn’t say anything about the treatment of animals. I was a bit annoyed that the Psychology Today article kept mentioning abuse, as if to stoke the ire of the animal rights activists. It’s interesting that the article mentions the Animal Welfare Act. It is true that there are some animal studies that the general population might find unsettlingly. However, there are so many regulations on what you can and cannot do when it comes to animal research, that I find the term “abuse” to be disingenuous. Contrast that with the article from io9.
I’m in total agreement that some animals have consciousness and that they should be treated humanely. Here’s an excerpt from the declaration.
The absence of a neocortex does not appear to preclude an organism from experiencing affective states. Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Nonhuman animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.
I’ve talked about birds already (see the PET link below). The rest of this post will focus on something I shared back in December 2011. I shared it privately as I was new to G+. So I’m redoing it here. The image below is a screen capture of a study by a group at the The University of Chicago The video is in the link below, Helping your fellow rat.. Bartal et al showed that rats can demonstrate empathy by having a free rat rescue his or her cagemate, which is placed in a plastic restrainer. Once the rats learned to open the restrainer, they only opened it if there was a cagemate in it, i.e., if it was empty or had an object inside they left it locked. Also, when presented with a locked cagemate and a locked piece of chocolate, the free rat would unlock both and share the chocolate. That’s better than many politicians. Rats were initially startled by the door opening. In later repeated tests, the rats were no longer surprised by the door opening, i.e., it was an expected outcome.
The data suggests that females are more empathetic. All of the females became door openers while only 70% of the males opened the door. Also, the females learned to open the door sooner than the male rats.
Combined with the bird studies, there is mounting evidence that animals have more going on in their brains than some people think.
Links to references:
The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness
Scientists Finally Conclude Nonhuman Animals Are Conscious Beings
by Marc Bekoff, Ph.D. in Psychology Today
Prominent scientists sign declaration that animals have conscious awareness, just like us
http://goo.gl/tWh8t io9 George Dvorsky
Something to crow about: PET Bird Brains
Helping your fellow rat: Rodents show empathy-driven behavior
Published in Science
Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats.
Ben-Ami Bartal I, Decety J, Mason P.
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30. doi: 10.1126/science.1210789.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=22158823
#ScienceSunday
September 15, 2013
Waaay back when I got my degree the common thought in Psych was that animals had no emotions, etc…. I knew it was wrong then, and am glad they are finally “proving the reality”.
September 15, 2013
Some years ago, Norwegian TV showed male piglets being collected and neutered. Luckily, we did not see the process itself, but we did see the poor piglets literally shaking with fear and pain, as they did the surgery using no anaestethic. If I remember correctly, this was to show inhumane treatment of animals, as the farmer himself insisted the pain-like reactions had nothing to do with pain, as a pig “was not intelligent enough”. Why only males? For better-tasting meat.
September 15, 2013
Robert Miller I won’t ask how far back. I had a coworker that believed that ‘lower’ animals couldn’t feel pain. I tried to explain that there is a whole host of cascading biochemical events associated with pain that would be a confounding problem with the data.
Knut Torgersen some farmers have changed there practices because a ‘happy’ animal is a better, healthier product.
September 15, 2013
Fascinating. I have to come back and read through the links.
September 15, 2013
The free rat would unlock both and share the chocolate. That’s better than many politicians. Priceless, Chad Haney Haha! Great post.
September 15, 2013
Thanks Mara Rose and Gita Jaisinghani
September 15, 2013
=)) great post Chad Haney
fits right in with the lecture of social psychology course at the moment
September 15, 2013
You are welcome Micha Fire
September 15, 2013
If anyone is having trouble with the video (I know it’s wonky), try this direct link. http://mindonline.uchicago.edu/media/news/bartal_768k.mp4
September 16, 2013
Thanks for the update Chad Haney I have, for a couple of decades now, assumed that perceived consciousness / sentience (not intelligence) should be our guide on what life forms we kill to eat… This summary will serve well as a reference point. Thanks.
September 16, 2013
I admire my vegetarian friends for that reason John Christopher
September 16, 2013
Okay
September 16, 2013
I like that rats share chocolate. 🙂
September 16, 2013
Hmmmm its life
September 16, 2013
Chad Haney We have animal protection rights ere in Norway, too, but they are sadly controlled by the same regime that takes care of food safety.
September 16, 2013
Is that bad in Norway, Knut Torgersen
September 16, 2013
I’d say it is regrettable that the same instance responsible for food safety also has the responsibility for animal safety. It feels a bit like a contradiction. We have no official RSPCA or similar.
September 16, 2013
You want good meat – treat animals well. What’s so odd about them working together?
September 16, 2013
I find it odd we have no separate animal interest organization. It feels like the military being the police force.
September 17, 2013
Okay