Science imagery

Science imagery

I was going to write a post about the Visualizing Science 2013 contest but my #ScienceSunday  co-curators beat me to it. Check out the images and videos. If you have questions, the ScienceSunday team will try to get you an answer.

Originally shared by ScienceSunday

Visualizing Science

Science you’d hang on your living room wall

Earlier this week, we shared a great example of scientific visualization, showcasing the   Pseudomonas    bacteria in a large green, bacteria covered hand (http://goo.gl/bWtKeP, via William McGarvey).

That was just one of many amazing scientific images from the 2013 Visualization Challenge sponsored by   Science   and National Science Foundation  , so here are several more beauties to behold. 

The challenge includes entries in several categories, including illustration,  posters & graphics, photography, games & apps, 

and video. So even this group of images just scratches the tip of the iceberg from the 200+ entries they received. You can see many more of the entries yourself, and learn about the science behind the images here: http://goo.gl/Bgx1n1

The images we highlight here illustrate a range of scientific results and phenomena, the description of which are from the   Science   article linked above:

Spherical Nucleic Acids

(by Quintin Anderson, The Seagull Company, Midland, Texas; Chad Mirkin and Sarah Petrosko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois)

The floating golden sphere, bristling with corkscrew strands of RNA, drifts majestically toward the jostling lipid bilayer that surrounds a cell. Slowly, gently, it squeezes through the layer until it is inside the cell.

Breezing across cell membranes is just one talent of these spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) developed by nanotechnology pioneer Chad Mirkin at Northwestern University. Once inside a cell, they can fend off attacks from enzymes, which makes them hot prospects as vehicles for delivering gene therapy treatments. SNAs also bind strongly to complementary strands of genetic material, an ability being used in a commercial medical diagnostics system called Verigene.

Mirkin commissioned Quintin Anderson, creative director at scientific animation firm The Seagull Company, to create a video explaining his research to colleagues and funders. The toughest part, Anderson says, was creating the lipid bilayer. “There are hundreds of thousands of lipids in those scenes and it required a complicated mathematical algorithm to create the random movements.”

The Life Cycle of a Bubble Cluster: Insight from Mathematics, Algorithms, and Supercomputers

(Robert I. Saye and James A. Sethian, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley)

“Isn’t that just a photograph of soap bubbles?” Robert Saye and James Sethian hear that all the time when people see their poster. “Naturally we are eager to point out that it is in fact a visualization of a physics computational model,” says Saye, who recently completed his Ph.D. with Sethian at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley.

Predicting how bubbles in a foam rearrange and rupture is a tough modeling problem, because it involves intricately coupled processes that operate at very different scales. The soap films are only micrometers thick, while the gas pockets themselves might be centimeters across. Meanwhile, individual films rupture in milliseconds; bubbles rearrange in a fraction of a second; and liquid inside the film drains over tens of seconds or longer.

Running a simulation at the smallest scales to predict the macroscopic effects would eat up vast amounts of computer power. “Instead, we found a way to separate distinct time and space scales, and allow these to communicate so that the most important physics affecting foam dynamics are captured,” Saye says. The model, published last year (Science, 10 May 2013, p. 720), could be useful in devising lightweight materials or optimizing industrial processes, he and Sethian suggest.

This image is a part of a larger poster that was entered in the contest,and you can see a video of the foam simulation at Bursting Bubbles at UC Berkeley

Cortex in Metallic Pastels

(Greg Dunn and Brian Edwards, Greg Dunn Design, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Marty Saggese, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, D.C.; Tracy Bale, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Rick Huganir, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland)

With a Ph.D. in neuroscience and a love of Asian art, it may have been inevitable that Greg Dunn would combine them to create sparse, striking illustrations of the brain. “It was a perfect synthesis of my interests,” Dunn says.

Cortex in Metallic Pastels represents a stylized section of the cerebral cortex, in which axons, dendrites, and other features create a scene reminiscent of a copse of silver birch at twilight. An accurate depiction of a slice of cerebral cortex would be a confusing mess, Dunn says, so he thins out the forest of cells, revealing the delicate branching structure of each neuron.

Dunn blows pigments across the canvas to create the neurons and highlights some of them in gold leaf and palladium, a technique he is keen to develop further.

“My eventual goal is to start an art-science lab,” he says. It would bring students of art and science together to develop new artistic techniques. He is already using lithography to give each neuron in his paintings a different angle of reflectance. “As you walk around, different neurons appear and disappear, so you can pack it with information,” he says.

The painting was commissioned for the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine’s Brain Science Institute, but, Dunn says, “I want to be able to communicate with a wide swath of people.” He hopes that lay viewers will see how the branching structures of neurons mirror so many other natural structures, from river deltas to the roots of a tree. “I want to help people to appreciate the beauty of the brain.”

You can read Greg Dunn’s description of how he came to merge art and science in this uniquely beautiful way at http://goo.gl/yYNmgc, and you can check out much more of his art+science work – and even order a print of this image to hang on your wall – here: www.gregadunn.com.

Invisible Coral Flows

(Vicente I. Fernandez, Orr H. Shapiro, Melissa S. Garren, Assaf Vardi, and Roman Stocker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge)

The swirling patterns moving around these coral polyps may look like fireworks streaking across a long-exposure photograph—but they are the result of a cunning technique that uses false colors to help compress time and movement into a single picture.

The image shows two Pocillopora damicornis polyps roughly 3 millimeters apart, colored pink. To reveal how the corals’ wafting cilia beat the water into a vortex, the team tracked particles in the water by video and super-imposed successive frames to highlight the flow (gold). About 90 minutes later, the coral polyps have changed position (shown in purple), altering the water flow (cyan), “but the vortex stayed roughly the same,” says Massachusetts Institute of Technology environmental engineer Vicente Fernandez, part of the research team that produced the image. The spacing between points in the vortex tracks even reveals the speed of the particles, he adds: “Up close you can see the steps of individual particles, see where the flow is strongest.” Fernandez says that the team drew inspiration from the palette used by Andy Warhol in his Flowers prints, which feature vivid, strongly contrasting colors.

The vortex helps draw nutrients toward the coral and sweep away waste products, says Fernandez’s colleague Orr Shapiro, an ecologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel. “Everywhere I look at corals now I find these vortical swirls,” he adds.

h/t to DJ Spin for inspiring the post

#ScienceSunday   #scisunABS  

Science breakthrough of 2013

Science breakthrough of 2013

I know it’s a bit late. I almost forgot about this. The Scientific American top ten is here:  http://goo.gl/n2PzKV What’s your favorite from Science?

You can read more about the runner ups here:

http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/12/sciences-top-10-breakthroughs-2013

and more detail here:

✣ Sleep: The Ultimate Brainwasher?

http://goo.gl/i8uxa5

✣ Source of High-Energy Cosmic Rays Nailed at Last

http://goo.gl/hAAdEe

✣ The CRISPR Craze

http://goo.gl/5G0owy

✣ ScienceShot: Bringing Up Brains

http://goo.gl/DC1AEe

✣ Gut Bugs Could Explain Obesity-Cancer Link

http://goo.gl/NdyPYU

✣ Appendix Evolved More Than 30 Times

http://goo.gl/3meOcN

✣ New Solar Cell Material Acts as a Laser As Well

http://goo.gl/24pPSG

✣ Structural Biology Triumph Offers Hope Against a Childhood Killer

http://goo.gl/VYnBvM

✣ Cell Investigating Breakthrough Stem Cell Paper

http://goo.gl/7XG0fp

✣ ScienceShot: Another Way to a Clear View

http://goo.gl/HYL15e

✪ Cancer Immunotherapy

http://goo.gl/h3oO6s

This is my lazy #ScienceSunday  post. Ask questions and I’ll try to dig up more info on the topics that I know about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X-Cl9CMVzg&feature=share

Be The Match, I’m a match

Be The Match, I’m a match

In 1998 I registered to be a bone marrow donor with the Be The Match organization. Nothing really happened until a week ago. I received an email in addition to the letter below, stating that I might be a match for a six-year-old boy. There was additional paperwork to go through to make sure that I was willing to continue and consent to further testing. Be The Match was able to use my old sample to confirm that I am a match for the boy (second letter from LifeSource below). So now I wait until the boy is ready for the transplant. I can’t tell you how it feels to possibly be able to help this boy.

☺Why bone marrow transplant?

There are many diseases that can benefit from bone marrow transplants, e.g. leukemia, lymphoma, and sickle cell anemia. In the case of sickle cell anemia, the patient’s blood can become crescent shaped (hence the name) and get stuck in the capillaries. It’s very painful. For leukemia and lymphoma the patient often receives either chemotherapy or radiation therapy to essentially wipe out the cancerous blood cells. In all conditions, the donor’s bone marrow helps make healthy blood for the patient.

☺How do they do the transplant?

Many of you have probably heard of the big needles that are used to get the bone marrow from the donor. Under anesthesia, special needles are used to extract liquid bone marrow from the left and right sides of the pelvic bone (from the back). http://goo.gl/l0byD6 The liquid bone marrow is injected into the patient intravenously. It takes about 15 days for the donor stem cells to engraft, i.e., find their way to the bone marrow and start producing blood cells. A more recent method, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC), is more like a real-time platelet donation. With a platelet donation, the donated blood is spun at high speed and centripetal force drives the blood cells to the bottom of the tube and plasma (including platelets) stays in the liquid portion of the sample. In the PBSC method, the donor is given drugs to increase the circulating stem cells. Basically blood is taken out from one arm, the stem cells are removed using a technique called apheresis. The donor’s blood is returned, minus the stem cells.

I don’t know much about the patient and I won’t know for some time. If the patient’s family chooses, I may learn more later. Do me a favor and have positive thoughts for this six-year-old boy so that everything goes well.

More info:

http://bethematch.org/

Happy #ScienceSunday  

The 0.04%

The 0.04%

Are you the 0.04%, i.e., would you cling to the 1 peer reviewed publication out of 2,259? This ties in nicely with my post on the dangerous trio in changing people’s minds.

https://plus.google.com/+ChadHaney/posts/WA7zHYK42Qn

h/t Rugger Ducky and Filippo Salustri et al.

#ScienceSunday  #Anti_anti_intellectualism

Originally shared by Wil Wheaton

“I just want to highlight this illuminating infographic by James Powell in which, based on more than 2000 peer-reviewed publications, he counts the number of authors from November, 2012 to December, 2013 who explicitly deny global warming (that is, who propose a fundamentally different reason for temperature rise than anthropogenic CO2). The number is exactly one. In addition Powell also has helpful links to the abstracts and main text bodies of the relevant papers.

“It’s worth noting how many authors agree with the basic fact of global warming – more than nine thousand. And that’s just in a single year. Now I understand as well as anyone else that consensus does not imply truth but I find it odd how there aren’t even a handful of scientists who deny global warming presumably because the global warming mafia threatens to throttle them if they do. It’s not like we are seeing a 70-30% split, or even a 90-10% split. No, the split is more like 99.99-0.01%.” (http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/2014/01/10/about-that-consensus-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/)

Will you change your mind?

Will you change your mind?

Buddhini Samarasinghe wrote about http://edge.org‘s annual question:

What Have You Changed Your Mind About? Why?

https://plus.google.com/+BuddhiniSamarasinghe/posts/JKSBovEfBxF

I thought about some of the hot-button topics and how you often can’t change people’s mind, even with overwhelming evidence. There are three things working against changing someone’s mind.

✿Confirmation Bias – the tendency to favor information that supports your existing view.

✿Cognitive Dissonance – action that contradicts reasoning, e.g., continuing to smoke when you agree it is unhealthy.

✿Motivated Reasoning – accepting information that supports what you already believe and giving extra scrutiny to information that is against what you believe.

Here’s a good blog to summarize these three concepts.

Psychology’s Treacherous Trio: Confirmation Bias, Cognitive Dissonance, and Motivated Reasoning

By Sam McNerney 2011

http://goo.gl/fNOA1o

There is a biological component too. Chris Mooney writes that emotion kicks in before you have a chance to reason. Evolution has lead animals to react quickly for survival. It makes sense that when we react quickly, we rely on what we believe first.

The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science

How our brains fool us on climate, creationism, and the vaccine-autism link.

By Chris Mooney 2011 h/t Marjolein Caniels

http://goo.gl/g1eAsm

The Mooney piece has many examples of the treacherous trio. I would suggest reading the McNerney blog first. This isn’t my area of expertise so I’m hoping Zuleyka Zevallos or Chris Robinson can chime in.

Image via Reddit

#ScienceSunday  #Anti_anti_intellectualism

What’s your favorite science news of 2013?

What’s your favorite science news of 2013?

Extracting DNA from a 50,000 years ago, that suggests inbreeding among hominins is pretty fascinating. Progress in genomics reminds me of computer technology. The technology keeps getting smaller and faster.

I’ll have to go through Mark Bruce’s SciSun digests to see which news article is my favorite for 2013.

#ScienceSunday  

Originally shared by ScienceSunday

Top 10 Science Stories of 2013

Here’s Scientific American’s top ten science stories of 2013.

http://goo.gl/10RGKB

The picture below is listed at number 5.

Genome of Neandertals Reveals Inbreeding

Image Source: via Science

http://goo.gl/4kcztb

DNA from the oldest known sample lead researchers to conclude that our neandertal relatives had some inbreeding.

What was your favorite science story of 2013? Is it missing from the list?

The ScienceSunday team would like to thank you for your contributions to #ScienceSunday  and #ScienceEveryday  in 2013. We wish you a happy New Year.

#ScienceSunday   #SciSunCH  

Photoshopped or Real: my vote is photoshopped

Photoshopped or Real: my vote is photoshopped

What happens when you look through a double convex (converging) lens? If the object is farther away than the focal point, the image will be inverted. This is due to how the rays of light are refracted by the lens. For more details see (http://goo.gl/G4hpmM). So why isn’t the image inverted, i.e. upside down? The glass of water forms a cylindrical convex lens with only one lateral curved surface. So the image should be inverted laterally (left-right). If the glass had a spherical bottom, it would also be vertically inverted. See the example of the tulip glass. Not knowing where the focal point is, we can’t guess if the image should be magnified or not. However, it appears as if the mountain range is taller on the right hand side, both inside and outside the glass. I’m assuming that the image is photoshopped and the “artist” forgot to laterally invert the image.

As C.A. Palma and Asrulfeezam Haniffa pointed out, the birds at the very bottom (base) of the glass give you another clue. The base should be a compressed composite of the entire view, not a continuation of it. Rajini Rao noticed that the lime does not appear to have any distortion from the glass. The glass itself seems to have a little reflection on some surface, but appears to otherwise be floating (also noted by Lionel Lauer and Jun C).

Here are some things that I noticed that are more indicative of photoshop and not so much as clues from optics.

The edges of the glass on the left and right appear very jagged (noticed by many). Lionel Lauer points out that the inner edge of the glass has a strange white light. Many noticed that the top of the water is not flat, yet the image is very sharp. Christopher Dreyer had an interesting idea that the liquid could really be a gel with a high refractive index. That would be very interesting. However, the other clues still lead me to think this is photoshopped.

The OP is here: http://goo.gl/dCqIAY along with the #ScienceSunday reshare here: http://goo.gl/UuGdEZ

Thanks everyone for your comments and votes. This was fun.

Let me echo what Samantha Andrews posted

Let me echo what Samantha Andrews posted

This is a fantastic post about underwater noise pollution. It’s been going on for years and still does not receive enough attention. I had been planning on my own post with the links below but Samantha Andrews did such a tremendous job, I’ll simply echo her post.

Here are some additional links.

Noise Pollution Could Frustrate Fish

http://goo.gl/ix66EO via WIRED 

With Noise Pollution Growing at Sea, A Texas Team Looks for Answers

http://goo.gl/M6QNmW via State Impact an NPR reporting arm

Science Update – Aquatic Noise Pollution

http://goo.gl/7jFpqm via Naked Scientists

#ScienceSunday 

Originally shared by Samantha Andrews

Most of us have been there.  You’re in a pub or a club trying to have a conversation but the music…it’s just too loud to hear what the other person is saying.  You shout louder and louder, the listener has their ear up close to your mouth but alas, the conversation doesn’t flow as it would do if you could both hear each other easily.  Now imagine that sound wasn’t just important for having a conversation, but for seeing.  And imagine that that loud noise preventing you from hearing properly wasn’t just in the pub, but occurred throughout your day-to-day activities.  

Noise pollution is a problem for cetaceans because they use echolocation to ‘see’ and hear.  It’s quite a nifty technique because often the ocean is too murky or too dark for your eyes to see very far in, but sound can still travel.  Thanks to evolution, cetaceans have echolocation down to a fine art.  Not only can they figure out that something is there, but they can work out what it is.  But when it’s too noisy, the echolocation process can be disrupted and activities like hunting, navigation, and pod communication can become difficult to impossible.  Noise has even been linked to stress, and increased energy expenditure in our aquatic brethren.  One of the problems with figuring out just how noise pollution is affecting cetaceans is a lack of baseline data – to a large extent we don’t know the status of cetacean populations inhabiting different areas.  When we do get around to taking measurements of noise, we don’t have a good handle on how noisy different areas were in the first place to know if the noise has increased.  This lack of baseline data includes in conservation areas designated as important marine mammal habitat – just like the Moray Firth up in Scotland.  

The Moray Firth is home to a well-studied population of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates), but it also has strategic importance, forming a base for North Sea oil and gas exploration and potentially in the future, a base for an offshore wind farm.  Noise is likely to increase but to figure out by just how much Nathan Merchant of the University of Bath, alongside Enrico Pirotta, Tim Baron, and Paul Thompson of the University of Aberdeen decided to get some baseline data before developments begin.  Once that data is in place, they argue, more accurate correlations between noise and effects of marine mammals can be determined.

During the summer of 2012, Nathan and his team placed two underwater noise monitors – both in deep narrow channels popular with the dolphins for foraging, as well as prime shipping traffic routes.  They then monitored the noise on a cycle of 1 minute every 10 minutes and tied that data up with Automatic Identification System (AIS) ship-tracking data.  For the other 9 minutes recordings still took place, primarily to provide more analysis of noise events of interest.  And of course, this sound recordings also picked up the bottlenose dolphins as well as other marine mammals, but the team also deployed C-Pods – recorders dedicated for marine mammal noise – at the sites.  Conditions like rain and wind can also create noise in the Firth so meteorological data was also collected.

The acoustic data confirmed that the dolphins were using the two site quite heavily, with recordings of their clicks at both sites being made every day.  The two sites differed a fair bit in their baseline noise levels, with one generally much noisy than the other, with shipping traffic appeared to be the main source of noise pollution.  The researchers hypothesise that increase in noise levels at the already noisy site may be less damaging to the dolphins than increases at the quieter site, because the noisy site has already suffered noise-related habitat degradation to which the dolphins have already become accustomed.  Indeed the Moray Firth population size is showing signs of being stable, and is perhaps even increasing which is a positive sign.  However, the dolphin vocalizations overlapped both in frequency and amplitude with the shipping traffic.  This is concerning because it means that there is a higher risk of the dolphin’s vocalization being masked out by increases in shipping traffic.  Just how much shipping noise is too much is still unclear.

The paper is published in the journal Marine Pollution Bulletin and has been made open access.  You can read it here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.058

There are also a couple videos up on youtube where you can listen to “short real-time clips” of the ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth, accompanied by ship tracking data, underwater recorders, and time-lapse cameras.  Check them out here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – The Sutors and here Ship noise monitoring in the Moray Firth – Chanonry

Image: Campaign image from the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (www.wdcs.org)

#marinescience   #sciencesunday   #dolphins   #noisepollution #openaccess