I’m bored so here’s another #ISeeTheWorldWithScience.

I’m bored so here’s another #ISeeTheWorldWithScience.

You can look here for an example from the previous #ISeeTheWorldWithScience here:

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+ChadHaney/posts/NxpNNozaDgh

The way the game works is that you tell me your guess for what the item(s) in the image below is/are, without saying the object. If you want to guess what the object(s) is, tell me something interesting about it but don’t say what your guess is. I’ll get annoyed if people don’t follow instructions and I’ll probably delete your guess. Yes, bah humbug. So please don’t blurt out the answer. In the past it has been fun to try to decipher the guesses as they were cleverly written by some.

If you don’t want to guess, you can tell me what science the image makes you think of.

In the link above, one of the clever guesses was humorous + a type of macaroni, which is great because the image was an elbow.

More examples of #ISeeTheWorldWithScience

http://goo.gl/98ZhNL via +Mark Crowley

http://goo.gl/kPz2Kr via +Rajini Rao

http://goo.gl/3nhaI4 via +Johnathan Chung

http://goo.gl/XpKIco and http://goo.gl/hp1EfB via me

#ScienceEveryday

Have fun learning science.

0 Comments

  1. Steven Spence
    December 21, 2015

    Alex, I’ll take “what satisfies bacteria for $300?”

    Reply
  2. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    Steven Spence, I’m going to assume that doesn’t work for any of the objects in the picture but I like your guess/comment.

    Reply
  3. Steven Spence
    December 21, 2015

    fair enough, because i have no idea what I’m seeing. the game is afoot, Trebek! 

    Reply
  4. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    A quick glance at Wikipedia says that Trebek has Ukrainian heritage. I was hoping for Greek as that would be a clue.

    Reply
  5. Dustin Zastera
    December 21, 2015

    Not sure about the foreground, by the background device is for hand numbing.

    Reply
  6. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    Dustin Zastera, I don’t know about hand numbing but if you aren’t careful, your hand would be more than numb.

    Reply
  7. Dustin Zastera
    December 21, 2015

    Is the foreground device a rotary tube breaker?

    Reply
  8. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    Dustin Zastera, I have no idea what that is so, I’m gonna say no.

    Reply
  9. Steven Spence
    December 21, 2015

    hmmm. i’m confused. particles are flying in circular clouds.

    Reply
  10. William Hart
    December 21, 2015

    It something we need to survive but in a cold and dangerous form?

    Reply
  11. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    You are on the right track, I think Steven Spence. An old timer from Lennep might be able to help you out.

    Reply
  12. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    William Hart, I think we survive just fine without. In fact you’ll probably live longer if you avoid it.

    Reply
  13. Steven Spence
    December 21, 2015

    well let’s not make things too transparent here, Chad. 

    Reply
  14. Chad Haney
    December 21, 2015

    Steven Spence, I figured everyone knows Old Bill from Lennep.

    Reply
  15. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    No one is going to try to use the hint about Lennep, Germany?

    Reply
  16. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    That’s a good guess in terms of how to play the game, Phoenix Williams, but it misses the mark a bit.

    Reply
  17. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    Chad Haney well, by hooks or by Crookes I have been braked. Although this is an improved design. It’s certainly not something I’d want to Dally with. 

    Reply
  18. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    I think x-rays are leading you all astray.

    Steven Spence and Phoenix Williams seem to be on the right track.

    Reply
  19. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Steven Spence is pretty darn close for the object in the back (in case people are guessing for both objects).

    Reply
  20. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    I was only guessing the back object. I thought you had said you didn’t know what was in the front, but I misread.  

    I think the background device would be something Stereopes would have approved of when working for Zeus. I’ll guess that it is related to Stereopes lineage and Maxwell’s silver hammer equations. 

    Perhaps music has the answer.

    _Almost imperceptible

    Something inexpressible.

    Science insusceptible

    Logic so inflexible

    Causally connectible

    Yet nothing is invincible._

    Reply
  21. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Oh boy, I think I’m twisted around now Steven Spence. Crookes is basically there but now I’m not sure I follow Steropes and Maxwell’s equations. Time for a little Google-Fu of my own.

    Reply
  22. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Ha, that’s awesome, Phoenix Williams 

    Reply
  23. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    It’s ok. This has been a stumper, but I think I have the general idea. I’ll wait for the reveal.

    Reply
  24. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Steven Spence, care to try on the object in the foreground? I won’t trash your guesses but you’ll have to do some heavy lifting.

    Reply
  25. David Hess
    December 22, 2015

    My guesses are now all over the place after reading suggestions and responses.  Is the background device for shaking things up a bit?

    Reply
  26. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    If you know how Crookes’ radiometer works, then it doesn’t really help.

    http://science.howstuffworks.com/question239.htm

    The helpful part is the name.

    Reply
  27. William Hart
    December 22, 2015

    Chad Haney​ sorry Chad what I thought it might have been was off ,I’m not verry science minded but I’ll keep reading can’t wait for answer

    Reply
  28. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    No worries, William Hart. The point is to have fun learning some science.

    Reply
  29. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    Chad Haney , well Google and porcelain thrones isn’t so far off then is it? I mean that’s related to plumbing which derives from Plumbum, right? 

    I was going down the wrong track with the back piece. I thought it was to generate instead of measure. 

    Let’s see what other people come up with. I’m out of my league. 

    Reply
  30. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Steven Spence, you are the closest so far on both objects. Generating vs. measuring was throwing me off.

    Was my clue about Wilhelm from Lennep helpful?

    Reply
  31. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    I went down the x-ray track with Lennep. 

    Reply
  32. Chad Haney
    December 22, 2015

    Steven Spence, I was hoping the unit of measurement would be the track you got on.

    Reply
  33. Steven Spence
    December 22, 2015

    Scintillating idea there, Chad Haney ! Your clues were fine. I went the wrong direction.

    Reply
  34. Chad Haney
    December 23, 2015

    The object in the background is a well counter connected to a Capintec CRC 55-tW system. It’s used in nuclear medicine to measure contamination (using a wipe test). You take a piece of paper and wipe a test area. You place the paper in a tube then measure the radioactivity in the well counter. You can also measure low amounts of radioactivity of in vitro biological samples using a well counter. If you know exactly what isotope you are looking for, you can specify that and the machine will look for that spectral signature. The CRC 55-tW also has a dose calibrator and the chamber for that is behind the well counter (cut out of the picture). The whole apparatus sits on top of a massive lead cabinet. The object in the foreground is a heavy lead lid for the cabinet. Most people put a trash bin, specially labeled for radioactive waste, below that opening. Some people mount the dose calibrator in that opening to further protect the workers.

    For those that didn’t catch the Lennep hint, Wilhelm Röntgen was born in Lennep, Germany. Rontgen is a unit of measurement for exposure to x-rays or gamma rays. In this case gamma rays was meant to be the more helpful clue.

    Reply
  35. Janice Hawn
    December 24, 2015

    When all is said and done, I still don’t think I know much more than I did before. You should give it to TSA it ought to make their inspections go well.

    Reply
  36. Kuhika S
    December 25, 2015

    cocktails and shaking

    Reply
  37. Steven Spence
    December 25, 2015

    Thanks for the explanation, Chad! I’ll know where to take Bruce Banner or Steve Rogers. 

    Reply
  38. Chad Haney
    December 28, 2015

    I hope Steven Spence and Phoenix Williams had fun.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.