Breaking the hype before it spreads too fast

Breaking the hype before it spreads too fast

Well done, Buddhini Samarasinghe.

#ScienceEveryday  

Originally shared by Buddhini Samarasinghe

Pulling a Fast One on Cancer

There is a report making the rounds on social media that really needs to be explained, because as usual the media hype is distorting the findings. The article in question was published in the Cell Stem Cell journal, and is #OpenAccess (http://goo.gl/pnoiwa). I will explain the background, what these results mean, and more importantly, what they don’t mean.

✤ Traditional chemotherapy is toxic to cells. The only reason traditional chemotherapy works is because it kills cancer cells faster than it kills normal cells. The side effects from chemo often happen because normal cells are also affected. One such side effect is the suppression of the immune system. This happens because chemo damages adult stem cells too, which impairs tissue repair and regeneration. 

✤ Blood stem cells (known as hematopoietic stem cells) are responsible for replacing our blood cells; these reside in the bone marrow. In this study, scientists investigated the effect of prolonged fasting on hematopoietic stem cells.

✤ Mice used in this study were fasted for 48 hours, which the scientists defined as prolonged fasting. These mice received no food, only water. They then treated the mice with cyclophosphamide, a common chemotherapy drug. They found that cycles of prolonged fasting reduced the damage caused to hematopoietic stem cells when the mice were treated with cyclophosphamide. They also found that prolonged fasting cycles promoted the regeneration of blood cells through the protection of hematopoietic stem cells. 

✤ Next, the scientists tested whether the effects of prolonged fasting were independent of the toxic side effects of chemotherapy. Could prolonged fasting alone stimulate hematopoietic stem cells to self-renew? Indeed, it could. 

✤ What is the molecular mechanism for this process? A growth factor known as Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) seemed to be involved. Growth factors are proteins that control the multiplication of cells. To examine this mechanism, the scientists used mice that were deficient in IGF-1.  If you’re curious about how these ‘knockout mice’ are generated, read http://goo.gl/jdbqbk. When these IGF-1 deficient mice were treated with cyclophosphamide, they showed similar results to the prolonged fasting mice; reduced levels of hematopoietic stem cell damage. So getting rid of IGF-1 induced the same protective effects on hematopoietic stem cells.  

✤ How does IGF-1 signalling protect hematopoietic stem cells? They found that the activity of an enzyme known as PKA was also reduced in these prolonged fasting/IGF-1 deficient mice. PKA controls the pathway involved in stem cell regeneration. So inhibiting IGF-1 or PKA signalling mimics the effect of prolonged fasting; it promotes the regeneration of hematopoietic stem cells, thereby reducing the immuno-suppressive side effect of chemotherapy. 

✤ This is really interesting data – this research has identified one of the signalling pathways in the intricate network of reactions controlling the behaviour of hematopoietic stem cells. The mechanism involves PKA and IGF-1 signalling.  

WHAT THE DATA DOESN’T SHOW

What this doesn’t show is that fasting is magically a cure-all for cancer. There isn’t a single study that shows lowered incidence of cancer in human populations that fast regularly. The fasting that these mice underwent also did not include the feasting that goes on every night as seen with human populations either. The scientists also conducted a small Phase I clinical trial in which patients undergoing chemotherapy fasted for 72h – the results are promising; their hematopoietic stem cells were protected when compared with the non-fasting control group. But obviously more data is needed, and it is highly inadvisable to fast before undergoing chemo, without the explicit guidance of a physician.

To summarise, fasting is not a cure for cancer. If anything, fasting does “cure” everything, eventually; this pathway involves a mechanism known as ‘death’. 

Image: fasting causes a major reduction in white blood cells followed by their replenishment after refeeding. These effects of prolonged fasting can result in the reversal of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. 

Image source: http://goo.gl/pnoiwa

#ScienceMediaHype   #ScienceEveryday  

0 Comments

  1. Buddhini Samarasinghe
    June 12, 2014

    Hehe nice pun there with the title Chad Haney 🙂 thanks for the share!

    Reply
  2. Chad Haney
    June 12, 2014

    No, thank you for busting the hype. I’m so far behind in many things, science posts being one of them. I’m pleased you took the time to write this.

    Reply
  3. Brigitte W.
    June 12, 2014

    Plussing to read later. Thanks for the article. 🙂

    Reply
  4. Gita Jaisinghani
    June 12, 2014

    Oh I hadn’t even heard of this new fad – well, not as new, at least. Clearly I’m behind on my fads, hehe.

    Reply
  5. Chad Haney
    June 12, 2014

    It’s not really a fad, Gita Jaisinghani. It’s more of pseudoscience/anti-pharma/granola-heads type people misinterpreting the real science article and saying that fasting will cure cancer. The project wasn’t anything like that.

    Reply
  6. Gita Jaisinghani
    June 12, 2014

    Fad aka “the latest miracle cure-all for cancer”, I meant, Chad Haney. Some of those come out of half-digested actual science; others out of nothing at all. And too many out of some kind of scam or the other.

    Reply
  7. Chad Haney
    June 12, 2014

    This isn’t really new though. I’ve heard people suggest to people with cancer that they should stop eating refined sugar. That will starve the tumor because that’s the only “food” that the tumor can use. The problem is that this won’t work even though there are partial truths in there.

    Reply
  8. Gita Jaisinghani
    June 12, 2014

    I seem to have heard that one before, yes.

    Reply
  9. Peter Edenist
    June 12, 2014

    We had a few posts on this in our community. I think Lacerant Plainer  removed the lot asking for detail on the testing procedures, control groups and the veracity of claims. I was intending to figure it out, though its not my area of understanding really. Shannan Muskopf this may be of interest to you as well.

    Reply
  10. Lacerant Plainer
    June 12, 2014

    I didn’t really understand the mechanism… but I am suspicious of all tall claims.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.